Is Confbridge Performance < Meetme Performance
Hi!
I did some tests with Asterisk 11.19.0 and Confbridge. I’ve wanting to migrate from Meetme to Confbridge for a long time now.
For two participants in a conference – one actual call and one local channel that are recording – the cpu sits at 20%. The result was the same with res_timing_pthread and res_timing_timerfd. For 15 calls the cpu sits at 200%. (res_timing_pthread)
This is a Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz server, and with Meetme/Dahdi the load for this was hardly noticeable.
Kernel: 2.6.32-openvz-042stab111.11-amd64, Debian 7 OpenVZ HN, with Debian 7 VE. And as I said – with Meetme in the same server you can barley notice the load. And with Confbridge it jumps to 20%…
Any idea why Confbridge comes with such a performance hit?
/Johan
2 thoughts on - Is Confbridge Performance < Meetme Performance
I built a conference server for a customer using the app_konference Asterisk module. He routinely has 75+ users in a conference and the load average doesn’t go above 1.00. Just a thought. Regards;
John
—–Original Message—
Ok, let med rephrase this:
Does anyone actually uses Confbridge and what are your experiences?
How about local channels in combination with Confbridge?
/Johan
Den 2015-09-23 kl. 13:37, skrev Johan Wilfer: