Load-balancing AMI And Load-balancing FastAGI?

Home » Asterisk Users » Load-balancing AMI And Load-balancing FastAGI?
Asterisk Users 1 Comment

Hi,

I am starting a new project to develop a predictive dialler system.

– Agents can start receiving calls from the queue if agent press
“Available” button on the browser which will unpause the queue on Asterisk.

– About 100-150 concurrents calls on a Asterisk box

– Call-out initiated. Other end answers. Passes AMD. Lands in Queue and direct to agents that is available and call is recorded.

– Update state of the call (Ringing, Talking, etc) on the database.

– Listen the events such as Hang Up from customer, check if call is successfully originated or what the failure, etc.

– Agent will have ability to transfer customer call to other agent or external number. As described above to develop a predictive dialler system, is it best to use AMI or FastAGI?

I am aware that I can setup FastAGI load balancing such as agitator
(FastAGI reverse proxy).

AMI case: load-balances incoming events/response across multiple processes
(multiple AMI connections on the same asterisk machine), should the ami events/response should be pushed into RabbitMQ so the proess can read from RabbitMQ ?

Thanks Paul

One thought on - Load-balancing AMI And Load-balancing FastAGI?