Does anyone know if there are any plans to update the dahdi-linux kernel module code? It no longer compiles with recent kernels, and the last release of dahdi-linux appears to have been around March of 2016. I am currently running 4.6.3-300.fc24.x86..
Any ideas why a VPS, cloned from another instance (DigitalOceandroplets if it matters), wont run on the new instance?Everything else is the same; region, memory, disk, hypervisor version etc.And everything else runs, just not Asterisk, unless I d..
, I had a problem with the dahdi XPP driver. After this error in syslog, the Xorcom disconnect from the server:Jun3 15:03:29kernel: [361010.637858] *NOTICE-xpp_usb: xusb-0(usb-0000:00:1d.7-3) [X1047686]: Sluggish USB. Dropping next PCM frame (p****ending_writes=5)*J..
Im hoping someone can help me here. Ive purchased replacement systems for 3 aging 1.4.x installs. Im hoping to setup Asterisk 11, dahdi 2.6.1 and Oslec. Im also moving those installs from Mandriva 10.0 to Debian 6.06 (Squeeze). In my testing, the TE2..
I have sevaral elastix installed but all of them show the physical memory is 2GB while the server has 4GB and some has 8GB. Ive upgraded to PAE kernel but yet i cant see mem beyond 2GB. How can i configure the centos kernel to use more memory as ..
I am installing Asterisk and Dahdi on my system and when I am installing dahdi it tels me to install the sources of the 3.1 kernel.
How to do this on Arch?
When I compile dahdi I see these warnings: WARNING: kasprintf [dahdi-linux-184.108.40.206/drivers/dahdi/wctdm24xxp/wctdm24xxp.ko] undefined! WARNING: kasprintf [dahdi-linux-220.127.116.11/drivers/dahdi/dahdi.ko] undefined! And modinfo dahdi shows that the driver ..
are there anybody, who using the chan_misdn included with Asterisk v1.8? If yes what mISDN version used v1 or v2? Yes, I can read on many pages for mISDN2 I need to use chan_lcr, but this informations are 2-3 years old, and I cant imagine asterisk v..
I would be very curious to know your opinion to both questions bellow. 1. As linux kernel simplified its naming recently, what do you think of todays libpri naming scheme (18.104.22.168, …) ? 2. What are the benefits of keeping libpri code separate f..
Im running an 8E1 setup to an SS7 carrier. The setup works but when we start hitting the 80 active calls mark the link became unstable. I found a lot of the following messages afecting my d channel Jun 25 15:49:55 ostional kernel: [385661.368857] dah..