Is Confbridge Performance < Meetme Performance

Home » Asterisk Users » Is Confbridge Performance < Meetme Performance
Asterisk Users 2 Comments

Hi!

I did some tests with Asterisk 11.19.0 and Confbridge. I’ve wanting to migrate from Meetme to Confbridge for a long time now.

For two participants in a conference – one actual call and one local channel that are recording – the cpu sits at 20%. The result was the same with res_timing_pthread and res_timing_timerfd. For 15 calls the cpu sits at 200%. (res_timing_pthread)

This is a Xeon E5620 @ 2.40GHz server, and with Meetme/Dahdi the load for this was hardly noticeable.

Kernel: 2.6.32-openvz-042stab111.11-amd64, Debian 7 OpenVZ HN, with Debian 7 VE. And as I said – with Meetme in the same server you can barley notice the load. And with Confbridge it jumps to 20%…

Any idea why Confbridge comes with such a performance hit?

/Johan

2 thoughts on - Is Confbridge Performance < Meetme Performance

  • I built a conference server for a customer using the app_konference Asterisk module. He routinely has 75+ users in a conference and the load average doesn’t go above 1.00. Just a thought. Regards;
    John

    —–Original Message—

  • Ok, let med rephrase this:

    Does anyone actually uses Confbridge and what are your experiences?
    How about local channels in combination with Confbridge?

    /Johan

    Den 2015-09-23 kl. 13:37, skrev Johan Wilfer: