libpri rpm version 1.4.12 for CentOS 5.6

Report
Question

Hi, Is libpri rpm version 1.4.12 for CentOS 5.6 made available ? [root@ ~]# rpm -qa | grep libpri
libpri-1.4.11.5-1_centos5
[root@ ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
[root@ ~]#
[root@ ~]# yum list updates | grep libpri
[root@ ~]# Please suggest/guide further. Regards, Kaushal

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 0 Answers

file2ban

Report
Question

On 07/26/2011 09:21 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
> I want to add an entry to a database every time a brute force
> registration attempt is done.
> from this database we are updating cisco routers with our ban list so
> our entire network is protected.
> The database side of things is working and has been for some time. I
> really would like to add the file2ban side of it to protect our asterisk
> system better.
>
> How would I best go about doing this using…

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 2 Answers

MariaDB 5.3.0 Beta available now

Report
Question

The MariaDB project would like to announce the availability of MariaDB 5.3.0 Beta, the latest addition to our growing lineup of supported software. MariaDB 5.3.0 beta includes all features in MariaDB 5.2 and is based on MySQL 5.1. Some highlights of new features include: - subquery optimizations that finally make subqueries usable - many optimizer changes, including Classic Hash Join, Batched Key Access, a new implementation of Multi-Range-Read optimizations as well as Index Condition Pushdown - NoSQL-style interfaces via the HandlerSocket plugin as well as dynamic columns - group commit in XtraDB when the binary log is enabled - Microsoft…

General 4.2 years ago 0 Answers

Securing Asterisk

Report
Question

Only way to cope with hackers would be that Digium comes to its senses and accepts to disable any response to a REGISTER whose username is unknown. I cannot think of a good reason why Digium finds this proposal unacceptable, given the onslaught of hacking that we are seeing in the industry. It may take a single line of code and it would save millions of $$$. Not only because the hackers will never get in, but because we would save a huge CPU impact responding to hundreds of REGISTER attempts per minute. It is a NO brainer. Can please…

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 4 Answers

Browser based SIP UA

Report
Question

Hello, can anyone recommend a browser based SIP client that works well with Asterisk?
I need something that requires authentication (based on Asterisks peer name and pass). Thanks in advance!
Alex

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 0 Answers

GNU Gatekeeper version 2.3.5 available

Report
Question

GNU Gatekeeper version 2.3.5 has been released. http://www.gnugk.org/gnugk-2-3-5.html This release has a number of new features as well as a few important bug fixes. New features: - working LDAP support (H.350) - much better checking of the config file for misspellings or obsolete settings (Fortytwo=42 is now obsolete) - SSH support for the status port - support for sending RIP messages - QOS data from H.460.9 and RTP sniffing available through status port and Radius - enable failover to CatchAll endpoint - enable failover for calls released by the gatekeeper (eg. timeouts) - see changes.txt for more new config…

VoIP News 4.2 years ago 0 Answers

NAT yes

Report
Question

Hello averybody, In a no natted environment if I letnat=yes on sip.conf it would cause some thing bad or it is irrelevant ? Anybody know ? thanks in advanced!

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 0 Answers

Callback + DISA

Report
Question

Hello, I am trying to use a Callback system that return the call to some
number then give it a dial tone with DISA. The callback works well and i
can hear the dial tone, the problem is that DISA doesn't do anything
when i press any extension number of the current context and hangs the
call up after few seconds. If i use callback just to return to the
number then call an extension (ex: a sip phone) it works fine, do you
know if there is some incompatibility about DISA + Callback?…

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 0 Answers

Why no traction for Windows version?

Report
Question

Hello, Since Asterisk has been ported to exotic platforms like SOHO routers
(Linksys, Buffalo, etc.) and non-MMU CPUs (Blackfin, etc.), I was
wondering why the Windows port never really took off. As far as I can tell, www.asteriskwin32.com is a one-man effort
(Patrick Deruel's) that is not going anywhere (latest version based on
1.2.26.2). Are there just not enough interest and too many, deep, Linux-specific
assumptions in the code, that would explain why Asterisk was never
officially ported to Windows? Thank you.

Asterisk Users 4.2 years ago 11 Answers